by:
Norman Clifford, Associate Scientist,
Robert Glass, Assistant Scientist,
Charles E. Krider, Professor of Business
1. The overall Kansas business environment is good; therefore changes should take the
form of fine tuning rather than a major overhaul of the state's economic development
programs and activities.
The state has had a program of economic development strategies in place for ten years.
Thus, the business environment survey could be viewed in part as collecting information on firms'
satisfaction with that program. The survey's clear finding that firms are satisfied with the Kansas
business environment generally is consistent with the conclusion that firms find the state's overall
economic development program to be working well. Thus, the appropriate course is to pursue a
modest agenda in specific areas that are found to be lacking.
2. The Kansas business climate would be substantially improved by reducing or eliminating
the property tax on business equipment and machinery.
The state and local tax structure was rated the weakest part of the Kansas business
environment by the firms in the survey. The property tax on business equipment and machinery
was rated as a strong or somewhat negative effect on the firm's investment decisions by 70
percent of the respondents. The rate of investment affects the productivity of labor in the short
run, but it affects productivity even more in the long run; for example, as a sequence of lower
investments accumulates to cause a very significant reduction in the level and age of the capital
stock. Since labor productivity is the single most significant determinant of the well being of the
average Kansan, actions that have effects on the level of investment by firms can have important
consequences.
3. The property tax on commercial and industrial real estate should be reduced.
The property tax on commercial and industrial real estate was rated as a strong or
somewhat negative effect on the firm's investment decisions by 73 percent of the respondents, the
highest total for any specific tax. Although some investments in new equipment, such as updating
an existing plant, may not require any additional real estate, others, such as an expansion of an
existing plant or the opening of a new plant, may require the firm to acquire additional land. Thus,
a tax on commercial and industrial real estate could well influence the rate of investment in
equipment and thereby affect the productivity of labor.
4. The efficiency of the workers compensation system should be improved to provide
reasonable costs to employers while maintaining protection for employees.
The workers compensation tax was rated as a strong or somewhat negative effect on the
firm's business decisions by 68 percent of the respondents, and a strong negative effect by 40
percent of the respondents. This was the highest strong negative rating of any individual tax. The
revenues from the workers compensation tax directly benefit workers, so simply reducing the tax
would not necessarily benefit Kansas workers, since the gains from increased productivity could
be more than offset by the losses of workers compensation benefits. Thus, the implication is that
the efficiency of the workers compensation system should be improved to provide reasonable
costs to employers while maintaining protection for employees.
5. Attention should be paid to the availability of air services in the state.
Air services were rated the lowest among the three kinds of infrastructure on the survey.
Even in urban counties, only one in five firms rated air services good or superior in terms of
suitability to their business activities. Although it seems unlikely that good or superior air services
could be made available uniformly across the state, an effort should be made to identify places
where significant improvements can be made.
6. Transportation services for mid-sized counties should be improved.
Firms in mid-sized counties ranked their highway system as inadequate twice as often as
firms in either rural or urban counties. They also ranked air services as inadequate more often than
either urban or rural firms. Thus, the transportation infrastructure in general seems to be further
from the needs of firms in mid-sized counties, and efforts should be focused there.
7. The availability of affordable housing in rural and mid-sized communities should be
addressed.
Although 72 percent of the surveyed firms said that the availability of housing was not a
constraint on their ability to expand, the seriousness of the housing constraint varies significantly
between urban and non-urban areas. While only three percent of firms in urban counties found
availability of housing to be a serious constraint, 14 percent of the firms in mid-sized counties and
18 percent of the firms in rural counties reported it to be a serious constraint. Thus, availability of
housing is acting as a serious constraint on expansion for a significant number of firms in rural and
mid-sized counties, and presumably on the ability of new businesses to locate in those counties.
8. Access to technology should be made available to all firms.
Although fewer than one in five firms reported access to technology as a weakness of the
Kansas business climate, it is still significant that a minority of firms see access to technology as a
problem. Thus, efforts to make technology available to all firms should be continued and
enhanced.