Fort Riley North CDP 2000 Population by Age by Gender | |||||
AGE | Male | Female | ![]() |
||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
under 1 year | 76 | 1.4% | 92 | 3.3% | |
1 | 117 | 2.2% | 119 | 4.3% | |
2 | 101 | 1.9% | 101 | 3.7% | |
3 | 101 | 1.9% | 95 | 3.4% | |
4 | 109 | 2.0% | 82 | 3.0% | |
5 | 108 | 2.0% | 88 | 3.2% | |
6 | 71 | 1.3% | 81 | 2.9% | |
7 | 78 | 1.5% | 75 | 2.7% | |
8 | 69 | 1.3% | 84 | 3.0% | |
9 | 60 | 1.1% | 66 | 2.4% | |
10 | 64 | 1.2% | 53 | 1.9% | |
11 | 52 | 1.0% | 47 | 1.7% | |
12 | 56 | 1.0% | 36 | 1.3% | |
13 | 42 | 0.8% | 38 | 1.4% | |
14 | 31 | 0.6% | 35 | 1.3% | |
15 | 37 | 0.7% | 29 | 1.1% | |
16 | 23 | 0.4% | 21 | 0.8% | |
17 | 19 | 0.4% | 23 | 0.8% | |
18 | 130 | 2.4% | 33 | 1.2% | |
19 | 381 | 7.1% | 56 | 2.0% | |
20 | 512 | 9.6% | 84 | 3.0% | |
21 | 485 | 9.1% | 102 | 3.7% | |
22 | 388 | 7.2% | 111 | 4.0% | |
23 | 267 | 5.0% | 96 | 3.5% | |
24 | 232 | 4.3% | 78 | 2.8% | |
25 | 182 | 3.4% | 101 | 3.7% | |
26 | 151 | 2.8% | 80 | 2.9% | |
27 | 164 | 3.1% | 78 | 2.8% | |
28 | 189 | 3.5% | 75 | 2.7% | |
29 | 157 | 2.9% | 89 | 3.2% | |
30 | 123 | 2.3% | 79 | 2.9% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
31 | 108 | 2.0% | 63 | 2.3% | |
32 | 90 | 1.7% | 52 | 1.9% | |
33 | 95 | 1.8% | 72 | 2.6% | |
34 | 77 | 1.4% | 55 | 2.0% | |
35 | 91 | 1.7% | 46 | 1.7% | |
36 | 58 | 1.1% | 44 | 1.6% | |
37 | 51 | 1.0% | 39 | 1.4% | |
38 | 46 | 0.9% | 37 | 1.3% | |
39 | 50 | 0.9% | 27 | 1.0% | |
40 | 22 | 0.4% | 19 | 0.7% | |
41 | 29 | 0.5% | 16 | 0.6% | |
42 | 29 | 0.5% | 11 | 0.4% | |
43 | 7 | 0.1% | 9 | 0.3% | |
44 | 6 | 0.1% | 7 | 0.3% | |
45 | 3 | 0.1% | 6 | 0.2% | |
46 | 5 | 0.1% | 4 | 0.1% | |
47 | 5 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.1% | |
48 | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 0.1% | |
49 | 5 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.0% | |
50 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
51 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% |
(Fort Riley North CDP continued)
AGE | Male | Female | ![]() |
||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||
52 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.1% | |
53 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
54 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
55 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
56 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
57 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
58 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
59 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
60 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
61 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
62 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
63 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
64 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
65 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
66 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
67 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
68 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
69 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
70 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
71 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
72 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
73 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
74 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
75 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
76 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
77 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
78 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
79 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
80 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
81 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
82 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.1% |
Policy Research Institute,
Source: Please email comments to: |
83 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
84 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
85 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
86 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
87 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
88 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
89 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
90 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
91 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
92 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
93 | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | |
94 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
95 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
96 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
97 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
98 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
99 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
100 to 104 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
105 to 109 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
110 and over | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |